Seed dispersers as disease vectors: bird transmission of mistletoe seeds to plant hosts


Journal article


C. Martinez del Río, A. Silva, R. Medel, M. Hourdequin
Ecology, vol. 77, 1996, pp. 912-921

View PDF
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
del Río, C. M., Silva, A., Medel, R., & Hourdequin, M. (1996). Seed dispersers as disease vectors: bird transmission of mistletoe seeds to plant hosts. Ecology, 77, 912–921.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Río, C. Martinez del, A. Silva, R. Medel, and M. Hourdequin. “Seed Dispersers as Disease Vectors: Bird Transmission of Mistletoe Seeds to Plant Hosts.” Ecology 77 (1996): 912–921.


MLA   Click to copy
del Río, C. Martinez, et al. “Seed Dispersers as Disease Vectors: Bird Transmission of Mistletoe Seeds to Plant Hosts.” Ecology, vol. 77, 1996, pp. 912–21.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{c1996a,
  title = {Seed dispersers as disease vectors: bird transmission of mistletoe seeds to plant hosts},
  year = {1996},
  journal = {Ecology},
  pages = {912-921},
  volume = {77},
  author = {del Río, C. Martinez and Silva, A. and Medel, R. and Hourdequin, M.}
}

The relationship between mistletoes and birds has been studied from the perspectives of mutualism and seed dispersal. Here, we emphasize the role that avian dispersers play as agents of mistletoe seed transmission to plant hosts. We describe the patterns of transmission of the seeds of Tristerix aphyllus, an endophytic Chilean mistletoe, on two of its columnar cacti hosts (Eulychnia acida and Echinopsis skottsbergii) by the Chilean Mockingbird Mimus thenca. In north-central Chile, these cacti grow in relatively discrete subpopulations on north-facing slopes. We measured variation in seed transmission within 10 subpopulations varying in species composition, host density, parasite density, parasite prevalence (defined as the percentage of hosts infested in a given population), and disperser abundance. Seed transmission was independent of species, but was strongly dependent on prior parasitism. Parasitized individuals received seeds much more frequently than expected from their relative abundance. We found no correlation between the density of hosts and seed transmission. We found strong positive correlations, however, between parasite prevalence and seed transmission to both parasitized and nonparasitized hosts. Seed transmission of T. aphyllus seeds by M. thenca appeared to be frequency- rather than density-dependent. Seed transmission was also tightly and positively correlated with the abundance of seed-dispersing birds at each site. Because bird abundance and parasite prevalence were correlated, we conducted path analysis to disentangle their relative effect on seed transmission. A model including only the direct effect of bird abundance and the indirect effect of parasite prevalence through bird abundance explained roughly the same variance as a full model including both the direct and indirect effects of bird abundance and prevalence on seed transmission. Apparently, variation in bird abundance was the main determinant of variation in transmission. We suggest that mistletoes, host plants, and the birds that disperse mistletoe seeds are systems well suited for studies of the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of disease transmission.





Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in